Ad
 
Learn More

Better Auth vs Keycloak

Learn how Better Auth and Keycloak differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Better Auth

Better Auth

A comprehensive authentication framework offering email/password, social sign-on, two-factor auth, and multi-tenant support with full TypeScript integration.
29,776stars+359(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Sponsor Better Auth ongithub.com
Screenshot of Better Auth
Favicon of Keycloak

Keycloak

Comprehensive open source identity management solution offering single sign-on, social login, and fine-grained authorization for applications and services.
36,518stars+579(+1.6%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Keycloak

Detailed Comparison

Keycloak appears to have several advantages over Better Auth, particularly in growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable
Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Better Auth having 29,776 stars and Keycloak having 36,518 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Keycloak has 8,873 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Keycloak wins
Growth Momentum

Keycloak is growing faster, adding 579 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 359 stars for Better Auth (+1.2%). Keycloak is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Better Auth last updated 6 hours ago and Keycloak 5 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Better Auth uses Next.js, Vue, SvelteKit, Nuxt.js, Tanstack Start, Remix while Keycloak leverages Bash, Python, C, Java.

Keycloak wins
Project Maturity

Keycloak has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Better Auth which began 2 years ago. This 11.0-year head start suggests Keycloak may have more mature features and established processes.

Better Auth wins
Licensing

Better Auth uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Keycloak's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Better Auth also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM) while Keycloak extends into Authorization & Permissions.

Keycloak wins
Hosting & Deployment

Keycloak provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Better Auth may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.