Learn how Authgear and Stack Auth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Authgear and Stack Auth have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Stack Auth significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 6,768 stars compared to 1,664 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests Stack Auth has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Stack Auth has 513 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 10 hours ago and Stack Auth 24 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Python, Golang while Stack Auth leverages Next.js.
Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Stack Auth which began 2 years ago. This 3.8-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.
Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Stack Auth's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM) while Stack Auth extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authgear and Stack Auth offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs