Learn how Stack Auth and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Zitadel appears to have several advantages over Stack Auth, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zitadel leads in popularity with 13,617 stars vs 6,768 stars for Stack Auth. The 101% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,039 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Stack Auth last updated 24 minutes ago and Zitadel 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Zitadel leverages SCSS, Golang, Lua.
Zitadel has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Stack Auth which began 2 years ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Zitadel may have more mature features and established processes.
Zitadel is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Stack Auth's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Both Stack Auth and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs