Learn how HyperDX and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both HyperDX and Uptrace have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
HyperDX leads in popularity with 9,467 stars vs 4,184 stars for Uptrace. The 126% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, HyperDX has 393 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HyperDX last updated 8 hours ago and Uptrace 15 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HyperDX uses CSS, JSX, Next.js while Uptrace leverages Python, Vue, Ruby, Django.
Uptrace has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to HyperDX which began 3 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests Uptrace may have more mature features and established processes.
HyperDX uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Uptrace's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: HyperDX also focuses on Log Management, Monitoring & Observability, Error Tracking while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both HyperDX and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.