Ad
 
Learn more

HyperDX vs Uptrace

Learn how HyperDX and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of HyperDX

HyperDX

Open source observability platform unifying session replays, logs, traces, metrics and errors. Fast search, automatic clustering, $0.40/GB pricing.
  • Stars


    9,688
  • Forks


    429
  • Last commit


    13 hours ago
  • Repository age


    3 years
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository
Screenshot of HyperDX
Favicon of Uptrace

Uptrace

Uptrace is an OpenTelemetry-based platform that integrates traces, metrics, and logs to help monitor and optimize complex distributed systems.
  • Stars


    4,243
  • Forks


    212
  • Last commit


    1 month ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository
Screenshot of Uptrace

Detailed Comparison

HyperDX appears to have several advantages over Uptrace, particularly in popularity, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

HyperDX wins
Community & Popularity

HyperDX leads in popularity with 9,688 stars vs 4,243 stars for Uptrace. The 128% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, HyperDX has 429 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

HyperDX wins
Development Activity

HyperDX shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Uptrace was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests HyperDX is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HyperDX uses CSS, JSX, Next.js while Uptrace leverages Python, Vue, Ruby, Django.

Uptrace wins
Project Maturity

Uptrace has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to HyperDX which began 3 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests Uptrace may have more mature features and established processes.

HyperDX wins
Licensing

HyperDX uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Uptrace's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: HyperDX also focuses on Log Management, Monitoring & Observability, Error Tracking while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both HyperDX and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.