What is the main difference between HyperDX and Uptrace?

HyperDX and Uptrace are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: HyperDX or Uptrace?

The choice between HyperDX and Uptrace depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from HyperDX to Uptrace?

Migration between HyperDX and Uptrace is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

HyperDX vs Uptrace

Learn how HyperDX and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

HyperDX

Open source observability platform unifying session replays, logs, traces, metrics and errors. Fast search, automatic clustering, $0.40/GB pricing.

Visit HyperDX Read more

9,985stars+58(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
2.43.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
hyperdxio/hyperdx

Uptrace

Uptrace is an OpenTelemetry-based platform that integrates traces, metrics, and logs to help monitor and optimize complex distributed systems.

Visit Uptrace Read more

4,311stars+13(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
12 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v2.1.0-rc.2
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
uptrace/uptrace

Detailed Comparison

HyperDX appears to have several advantages over Uptrace, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

HyperDX wins

Community & Popularity

HyperDX leads in popularity with 9,985 stars vs 4,311 stars for Uptrace. The 132% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, HyperDX has 510 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

HyperDX wins

Growth Momentum

HyperDX is growing faster, adding 58 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 13 stars for Uptrace (+0.3%). HyperDX is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with HyperDX last updated 9 hours ago and Uptrace 12 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Golang, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HyperDX uses CSS, JSX, Next.js while Uptrace leverages Python, Vue, Ruby, Django.

Uptrace wins

Project Maturity

Uptrace has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to HyperDX which began 3 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests Uptrace may have more mature features and established processes.

HyperDX wins

Licensing

HyperDX uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Uptrace's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: HyperDX also focuses on Log Management, Error Tracking while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable