Learn how Coroot and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Coroot and Uptrace have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Coroot leads in popularity with 7,878 stars vs 4,264 stars for Uptrace. The 85% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Coroot has 390 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Coroot and Uptrace are moving at much the same rate, adding 36 stars and adding 21 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Coroot last updated 1 day ago and Uptrace 6 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Golang, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Coroot uses CSS, JSX while Uptrace leverages Python, SCSS, Ruby, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with Coroot beginning 4 years ago and Uptrace 5 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Coroot is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Uptrace uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Coroot also focuses on Log Management.
Both Coroot and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.