Learn how Coroot and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Coroot and Uptrace have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Coroot leads in popularity with 7,568 stars vs 4,174 stars for Uptrace. The 81% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Coroot has 357 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Coroot last updated 2 days ago and Uptrace 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Golang, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Coroot uses CSS, JSX while Uptrace leverages Python, SCSS, Ruby, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with Coroot beginning 4 years ago and Uptrace 4 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Coroot is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Uptrace uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Coroot also focuses on Log Management.
Uptrace provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Coroot may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.