What is the main difference between OpenObserve and Uptrace?

OpenObserve and Uptrace are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: OpenObserve or Uptrace?

The choice between OpenObserve and Uptrace depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from OpenObserve to Uptrace?

Migration between OpenObserve and Uptrace is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

ScreenshotOne – The screenshot API for developers. Render screenshots in one simple API call

Learn More

OpenObserve vs Uptrace

Learn how OpenObserve and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

OpenObserve

Monitor logs, metrics, and traces with an open-source observability platform. Achieve petabyte scale with 140x lower storage costs and high performance.

Visit OpenObserve Read more

22,063stars+659(+3.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
11 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
v1.0.3
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
openobserve/openobserve

Uptrace

Uptrace is an OpenTelemetry-based platform that integrates traces, metrics, and logs to help monitor and optimize complex distributed systems.

Visit Uptrace Read more

4,290stars+23(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v2.1.0-beta.8
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
uptrace/uptrace

Sponsor Uptrace onuptrace.dev

Detailed Comparison

OpenObserve appears to have several advantages over Uptrace, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

OpenObserve wins

Community & Popularity

OpenObserve significantly outpaces Uptrace in community adoption with 22,063 stars compared to 4,290 stars on GitHub. This 5.1x difference suggests OpenObserve has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenObserve has 1,100 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

OpenObserve wins

Growth Momentum

OpenObserve is growing faster, adding 659 stars in the last 30 days (+3.1%) against adding 23 stars for Uptrace (+0.5%). OpenObserve is both larger and pulling further ahead.

OpenObserve wins

Development Activity

OpenObserve shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Uptrace was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests OpenObserve is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenObserve uses CSS, Rust while Uptrace leverages Python, Golang, Ruby, Django.

Uptrace wins

Project Maturity

Uptrace has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to OpenObserve which began 4 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Uptrace may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenObserve also focuses on Log Management while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable