What is the main difference between Grafana and OpenObserve?

Grafana and OpenObserve are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Grafana or OpenObserve?

The choice between Grafana and OpenObserve depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Grafana to OpenObserve?

Migration between Grafana and OpenObserve is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Grafana vs OpenObserve

Learn how Grafana and OpenObserve differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

Grafana

Grafana unifies metrics, logs, traces, profiles, and business data into one OpenTelemetry-native platform with AI-assisted root cause analysis and adaptive cost controls.

Visit Grafana Read more

77,638stars+587(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v13.3.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
grafana/grafana

OpenObserve

Monitor logs, metrics, and traces with an open-source observability platform. Achieve petabyte scale with 140x lower storage costs and high performance.

Visit OpenObserve Read more

22,699stars+460(+2.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
v1.1.2
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
openobserve

Detailed Comparison

Both Grafana and OpenObserve have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Grafana wins

Community & Popularity

Grafana significantly outpaces OpenObserve in community adoption with 77,638 stars compared to 22,699 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Grafana has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 14,905 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

OpenObserve wins

Growth Momentum

OpenObserve is growing faster, adding 460 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 587 stars for Grafana (+0.8%). OpenObserve is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 9 hours ago and OpenObserve 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses JSX, Python, Golang, Ruby while OpenObserve leverages SCSS, Rust, Vue.

Grafana wins

Project Maturity

Grafana has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to OpenObserve which began 4 years ago. This 9.3-year head start suggests Grafana may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring, Data Visualization while OpenObserve extends into Log Management.

Comparable