What is the main difference between Grafana and Maple?

Grafana and Maple are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Grafana or Maple?

The choice between Grafana and Maple depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Grafana to Maple?

Migration between Grafana and Maple is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.

Learn More

Grafana vs Maple

Learn how Grafana and Maple differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

Grafana

Grafana unifies metrics, logs, traces, profiles, and business data into one OpenTelemetry-native platform with AI-assisted root cause analysis and adaptive cost controls.

Visit Grafana Read more

76,981stars+467(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v13.2.2
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
grafana/grafana

Maple

Observability platform built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse. Collect, visualize, and query distributed traces, logs, and metrics, with an MCP server for AI agent diagnostics.

Visit Maple Read more

1,801stars+65(+3.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
8 months
Version
v0.0.22
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/maple

Detailed Comparison

Grafana appears to have several advantages over Maple, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Grafana wins

Community & Popularity

Grafana significantly outpaces Maple in community adoption with 76,981 stars compared to 1,801 stars on GitHub. This 42.7x difference suggests Grafana has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 14,797 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Maple wins

Growth Momentum

Maple is growing faster, adding 65 stars in the last 30 days (+3.7%) against adding 467 stars for Grafana (+0.6%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 3 hours ago and Maple 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses Ruby while Maple leverages Rust, Vue, Swift.

Grafana wins

Project Maturity

Grafana has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Maple which began 8 months ago. This 12.4-year head start suggests Grafana may have more mature features and established processes.

Grafana wins

Licensing

Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Maple's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Infrastructure Monitoring, Data Visualization while Maple extends into Log Management.

Comparable