Learn how Maple and NetData differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

NetData appears to have several advantages over Maple, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NetData significantly outpaces Maple in community adoption with 80,229 stars compared to 1,701 stars on GitHub. This 47.2x difference suggests NetData has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NetData has 6,590 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Maple is growing faster, adding 41 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 496 stars for NetData (+0.6%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Maple last updated 6 hours ago and NetData 8 hours ago.
NetData has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Maple which began 6 months ago. This 12.8-year head start suggests NetData may have more mature features and established processes.
NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Maple's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Maple also focuses on Log Management while NetData extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Maple and NetData offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.