What is the main difference between Maple and NetData?

Maple and NetData are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Maple or NetData?

The choice between Maple and NetData depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Maple to NetData?

Migration between Maple and NetData is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Bright Data – Web data for AI agents and apps. Built-in unblocking, proxies, and ready-made APIs.

Learn more

Maple vs NetData

Learn how Maple and NetData differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

Maple

Observability platform built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse. Collect, visualize, and query distributed traces, logs, and metrics, with an MCP server for AI agent diagnostics.

Visit Maple Read more

1,950stars+135(+7.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 hours ago
Repository age
9 months
Version
v0.3.5
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/maple

NetData

Powerful, efficient, and user-friendly monitoring solution for servers, containers, and applications with instant insights and alerts.

Visit NetData Read more

81,299stars+442(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
16 hours ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v2.12.3
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
netdata/netdata

Detailed Comparison

NetData appears to have several advantages over Maple, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

NetData wins

Community & Popularity

NetData significantly outpaces Maple in community adoption with 81,299 stars compared to 1,950 stars on GitHub. This 41.7x difference suggests NetData has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NetData has 6,718 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Maple wins

Growth Momentum

Maple is growing faster, adding 135 stars in the last 30 days (+7.4%) against adding 442 stars for NetData (+0.5%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Maple last updated 14 hours ago and NetData 16 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, Golang, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Maple uses Typescript, JSX, Vue, Swift while NetData leverages C, Objective-C, C++.

NetData wins

Project Maturity

NetData has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Maple which began 9 months ago. This 12.8-year head start suggests NetData may have more mature features and established processes.

NetData wins

Licensing

NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Maple's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Maple also focuses on Log Management while NetData extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable