Learn how Maple and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Uptrace appears to have several advantages over Maple, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Uptrace leads in popularity with 4,263 stars vs 1,692 stars for Maple. The 152% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Uptrace has 214 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Maple is growing faster, adding 32 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 21 stars for Uptrace (+0.5%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Maple last updated 1 day ago and Uptrace 6 days ago.
Uptrace has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Maple which began 6 months ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Uptrace may have more mature features and established processes.
Uptrace is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Maple's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Maple also focuses on Log Management while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Maple and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.