What is the main difference between Maple and Uptrace?

Maple and Uptrace are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Maple or Uptrace?

The choice between Maple and Uptrace depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Maple to Uptrace?

Migration between Maple and Uptrace is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Maple vs Uptrace

Learn how Maple and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

Maple

Observability platform built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse. Collect, visualize, and query distributed traces, logs, and metrics, with an MCP server for AI agent diagnostics.

Visit Maple Read more

1,801stars+70(+4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
11 hours ago
Repository age
8 months
Version
v0.0.22
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/maple

Uptrace

Uptrace is an OpenTelemetry-based platform that integrates traces, metrics, and logs to help monitor and optimize complex distributed systems.

Visit Uptrace Read more

4,293stars+19(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 months ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v2.1.0-beta.8
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
uptrace/uptrace

Sponsor Uptrace onuptrace.dev

Detailed Comparison

Both Maple and Uptrace have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptrace wins

Community & Popularity

Uptrace leads in popularity with 4,293 stars vs 1,801 stars for Maple. The 138% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Uptrace has 218 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Maple wins

Growth Momentum

Maple is growing faster, adding 70 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 19 stars for Uptrace (+0.4%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Maple wins

Development Activity

Maple shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Uptrace was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Maple is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Maple uses CSS, JSX, Rust, Swift while Uptrace leverages SCSS, Ruby, Django.

Uptrace wins

Project Maturity

Uptrace has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Maple which began 8 months ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Uptrace may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptrace wins

Licensing

Uptrace is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Maple's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Maple also focuses on Log Management while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable