What is the main difference between Maple and Uptrace?

Maple and Uptrace are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Maple or Uptrace?

The choice between Maple and Uptrace depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Maple to Uptrace?

Migration between Maple and Uptrace is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Maple vs Uptrace

Learn how Maple and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

Maple

Observability platform built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse. Collect, visualize, and query distributed traces, logs, and metrics, with an MCP server for AI agent diagnostics.

Visit Maple Read more

1,950stars+135(+7.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
15 hours ago
Repository age
9 months
Version
v0.3.5
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/maple

Uptrace

Uptrace is an OpenTelemetry-based platform that integrates traces, metrics, and logs to help monitor and optimize complex distributed systems.

Visit Uptrace Read more

4,311stars+11(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
17 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v2.1.0-rc.2
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
uptrace/uptrace

Detailed Comparison

Uptrace appears to have several advantages over Maple, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Uptrace wins

Community & Popularity

Uptrace leads in popularity with 4,311 stars vs 1,950 stars for Maple. The 121% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Uptrace has 225 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Maple wins

Growth Momentum

Maple is growing faster, adding 135 stars in the last 30 days (+7.4%) against adding 11 stars for Uptrace (+0.3%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Maple last updated 15 hours ago and Uptrace 17 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Maple uses CSS, JSX, Rust, Swift while Uptrace leverages SCSS, Ruby, Django.

Uptrace wins

Project Maturity

Uptrace has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Maple which began 9 months ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Uptrace may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptrace wins

Licensing

Uptrace is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Maple's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Maple also focuses on Log Management while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable