Maple vs Uptrace

Uptrace leads in popularity with 4,280 stars vs 1,768 stars for Maple. The 142% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Uptrace has 216 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Maple is growing faster, adding 108 stars in the last 30 days (+6.5%) against adding 24 stars for Uptrace (+0.6%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Maple last updated 15 hours ago and Uptrace 26 days ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Maple uses CSS, JSX, Rust, Swift while Uptrace leverages SCSS, Ruby, Django.

Uptrace has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Maple which began 7 months ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Uptrace may have more mature features and established processes.

Uptrace is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Maple's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Maple also focuses on Log Management while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Both Maple and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.