Learn how Sentry and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Activity score

Sentry appears to have several advantages over Uptrace, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Sentry significantly outpaces Uptrace in community adoption with 44,341 stars compared to 4,243 stars on GitHub. This 10.5x difference suggests Sentry has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Sentry has 4,761 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Sentry shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Uptrace was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Sentry is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Sentry uses CSS, Lua while Uptrace leverages SCSS, Golang, Vue, Ruby, Django.
Sentry has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Uptrace which began 5 years ago. This 11.5-year head start suggests Sentry may have more mature features and established processes.
Uptrace is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Sentry's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Sentry also focuses on Error Tracking while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Sentry and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.