Learn how Sentry and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Both Sentry and SigNoz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Sentry having 44,313 stars and SigNoz having 30,297 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Sentry has 4,757 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Sentry last updated 9 hours ago and SigNoz 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Sentry uses CSS, Lua while SigNoz leverages JSX, SCSS, Golang.
Sentry has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to SigNoz which began 6 years ago. This 10.5-year head start suggests Sentry may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Sentry also focuses on Error Tracking while SigNoz extends into Infrastructure Monitoring, Log Management, Monitoring & Observability.
Both Sentry and SigNoz offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.