Learn how Sentry and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Sentry appears to have several advantages over SigNoz, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Sentry leads in popularity with 43,631 stars vs 26,612 stars for SigNoz. The 64% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Sentry has 4,655 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Sentry last updated 5 hours ago and SigNoz 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Sentry uses CSS, Lua while SigNoz leverages JSX, SCSS, Golang.
Sentry has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to SigNoz which began 5 years ago. This 10.5-year head start suggests Sentry may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Sentry also focuses on Error Tracking while SigNoz extends into Infrastructure Monitoring, Log Management, Monitoring & Observability.
Both Sentry and SigNoz offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.