Learn how Highlight and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Highlight and SigNoz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
SigNoz leads in popularity with 26,671 stars vs 9,240 stars for Highlight. The 189% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, SigNoz has 2,122 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Highlight last updated 9 days ago and SigNoz 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, SCSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Highlight uses CSS, Next.js, Rust, PHP, Java, Ruby, C#, Perl, Elixir.
Both projects started around the same time, with Highlight beginning 6 years ago and SigNoz 5 years ago.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Highlight also focuses on Error Tracking while SigNoz extends into Infrastructure Monitoring, Log Management, Monitoring & Observability.
Both Highlight and SigNoz offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.