Learn how ProjectDiscovery and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both ProjectDiscovery and SigNoz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both ProjectDiscovery and SigNoz show comparable community engagement with 30,602 and 31,881 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, ProjectDiscovery has 3,805 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
ProjectDiscovery is growing faster, adding 739 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 530 stars for SigNoz (+1.7%). ProjectDiscovery is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ProjectDiscovery last updated 3 days ago and SigNoz 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ProjectDiscovery uses Java while SigNoz leverages JSX, SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with ProjectDiscovery beginning 6 years ago and SigNoz 6 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: ProjectDiscovery also focuses on Security Automation (SIEM/SOAR), Vulnerability Scanning while SigNoz extends into Performance Monitoring (APM), Log Management.
SigNoz provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while ProjectDiscovery may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs