Learn how NetData and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both NetData and SigNoz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NetData leads in popularity with 80,396 stars vs 31,989 stars for SigNoz. The 151% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, NetData has 6,611 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NetData and SigNoz are moving at much the same rate, adding 417 stars and adding 235 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with NetData last updated 15 hours ago and SigNoz 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: NetData uses CSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++ while SigNoz leverages Typescript, JSX, SCSS.
NetData has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to SigNoz which began 6 years ago. This 7.7-year head start suggests NetData may have more mature features and established processes.
SigNoz uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than NetData's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: SigNoz extends into Log Management.
Both NetData and SigNoz offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs