Learn how Checkmk and NetData differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

NetData appears to have several advantages over Checkmk, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NetData significantly outpaces Checkmk in community adoption with 78,492 stars compared to 2,244 stars on GitHub. This 35.0x difference suggests NetData has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NetData has 6,417 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmk last updated 8 hours ago and NetData 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Checkmk uses Typescript, SCSS, PHP, Vue, C#, Perl.
NetData has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Checkmk which began 7 years ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests NetData may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Checkmk is licensed under GPL-2.0 while NetData uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: NetData extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).