Learn how Checkmk and Zabbix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Zabbix appears to have several advantages over Checkmk, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zabbix leads in popularity with 6,438 stars vs 2,386 stars for Checkmk. The 170% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zabbix has 1,265 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Checkmk and Zabbix are moving at much the same rate, adding 33 stars and adding 97 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmk last updated 12 hours ago and Zabbix 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Golang, SCSS, C, Objective-C, PHP, C++, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Checkmk uses Typescript, Python, Rust, Vue, C# while Zabbix leverages Java.
Zabbix has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Checkmk which began 8 years ago. This 5.1-year head start suggests Zabbix may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Checkmk is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Zabbix uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Checkmk and Zabbix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.