Learn how Checkmk and Zabbix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Zabbix appears to have several advantages over Checkmk, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zabbix leads in popularity with 6,377 stars vs 2,367 stars for Checkmk. The 169% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zabbix has 1,254 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zabbix is growing faster, adding 105 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 26 stars for Checkmk (+1.1%). Zabbix is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmk last updated 9 hours ago and Zabbix 16 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, SCSS, Golang, C, Objective-C, PHP, C++, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Checkmk uses Typescript, Python, Rust, Vue, C# while Zabbix leverages Java.
Zabbix has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Checkmk which began 8 years ago. This 5.1-year head start suggests Zabbix may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Checkmk is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Zabbix uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Checkmk and Zabbix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.