Learn how Checkmk and Zabbix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
8 yearsLicense
GPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
checkmk/checkmk
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
zabbix/zabbix
Both Checkmk and Zabbix have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zabbix leads in popularity with 6,507 stars vs 2,617 stars for Checkmk. The 149% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zabbix has 1,269 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Checkmk is growing faster, adding 239 stars in the last 30 days (+10%) against adding 92 stars for Zabbix (+1.4%). Checkmk is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmk last updated 4 hours ago and Zabbix 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Golang, SCSS, C, Objective-C, PHP, C++, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Checkmk uses Typescript, Python, Rust, Vue, C# while Zabbix leverages Java.
Zabbix has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Checkmk which began 8 years ago. This 5.1-year head start suggests Zabbix may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Checkmk is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Zabbix uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Checkmk and Zabbix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.