Learn how Checkmk and Scanopy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
8 yearsLicense
GPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
checkmk/checkmk
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.19.6License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
scanopy/scanopy
Both Checkmk and Scanopy have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Scanopy leads in popularity with 5,944 stars vs 2,633 stars for Checkmk. The 126% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Checkmk has 580 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Checkmk is growing faster, adding 242 stars in the last 30 days (+10%) against adding 94 stars for Scanopy (+1.6%). Checkmk is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmk last updated 2 days ago and Scanopy 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Checkmk uses Python, Golang, SCSS, C, Objective-C, PHP, Vue, C++, C#, Perl while Scanopy leverages SvelteKit.
Checkmk has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Scanopy which began 1 year ago. This 6.7-year head start suggests Checkmk may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Checkmk is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Scanopy uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Checkmk and Scanopy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.