Learn how Checkmk and Scanopy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Checkmk and Scanopy have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Scanopy leads in popularity with 5,703 stars vs 2,359 stars for Checkmk. The 142% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Checkmk has 555 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Scanopy is growing faster, adding 437 stars in the last 30 days (+8.3%) against adding 22 stars for Checkmk (+0.9%). Scanopy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmk last updated 11 hours ago and Scanopy 6 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Checkmk uses Python, SCSS, Golang, C, Objective-C, Vue, PHP, C++, C#, Perl while Scanopy leverages SvelteKit.
Checkmk has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Scanopy which began 11 months ago. This 6.7-year head start suggests Checkmk may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Checkmk is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Scanopy uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Checkmk and Scanopy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.