Learn how Checkmk and Scanopy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Checkmk and Scanopy have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Scanopy leads in popularity with 5,335 stars vs 2,345 stars for Checkmk. The 128% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Checkmk has 554 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Checkmk and Scanopy are moving at much the same rate, adding 28 stars and adding 69 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.2% vs +1.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Checkmk last updated 9 hours ago and Scanopy 3 days ago.
Checkmk has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Scanopy which began 11 months ago. This 6.7-year head start suggests Checkmk may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Checkmk is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Scanopy uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Checkmk and Scanopy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.