What is the main difference between Icinga and Scanopy?

Icinga and Scanopy are both infrastructure monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Icinga or Scanopy?

The choice between Icinga and Scanopy depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Icinga to Scanopy?

Migration between Icinga and Scanopy is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

Icinga vs Scanopy

Learn how Icinga and Scanopy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.

Icinga

Monitor networks, servers, and cloud environments with flexible open-source solution. Custom checks, fast alerts, and complete infrastructure control.

Visit Icinga Read more

2,245stars+7(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v2.16.6
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
icinga/icinga2

Scanopy

Discovers your network via SNMP, LLDP, and ARP, then builds and maintains L2/L3 topology diagrams, host inventories, and service dependency maps automatically.

Visit Scanopy Read more

5,944stars+94(+1.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v0.19.6
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
scanopy/scanopy

Detailed Comparison

Both Icinga and Scanopy have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Scanopy wins

Community & Popularity

Scanopy leads in popularity with 5,944 stars vs 2,245 stars for Icinga. The 165% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Icinga has 623 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Scanopy wins

Growth Momentum

Scanopy is growing faster, adding 94 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 7 stars for Icinga (+0.3%). Scanopy is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Icinga last updated 2 days ago and Scanopy 3 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Icinga uses Python, C, Objective-C, C++, C# while Scanopy leverages CSS, Typescript, Rust, SvelteKit.

Icinga wins

Project Maturity

Icinga has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Scanopy which began 1 year ago. This 12.3-year head start suggests Icinga may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Icinga is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Scanopy uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable