Learn how Icinga and Scanopy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Icinga and Scanopy have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Scanopy leads in popularity with 5,335 stars vs 2,232 stars for Icinga. The 139% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Icinga has 617 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Scanopy is growing faster, adding 69 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 14 stars for Icinga (+0.6%). Scanopy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Icinga last updated 19 hours ago and Scanopy 3 days ago.
Icinga has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Scanopy which began 11 months ago. This 12.3-year head start suggests Icinga may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Icinga is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Scanopy uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Icinga and Scanopy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.