Learn how Icinga and Zabbix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Zabbix appears to have several advantages over Icinga, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zabbix leads in popularity with 6,306 stars vs 2,232 stars for Icinga. The 183% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zabbix has 1,254 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zabbix is growing faster, adding 59 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 11 stars for Icinga (+0.5%). Zabbix is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Icinga last updated 12 hours ago and Zabbix 13 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Icinga beginning 13 years ago and Zabbix 12 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Icinga is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Zabbix uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Icinga and Zabbix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.