Learn how Scanopy and Zabbix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Scanopy and Zabbix have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Scanopy having 5,734 stars and Zabbix having 6,377 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Zabbix has 1,254 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Scanopy is growing faster, adding 416 stars in the last 30 days (+7.8%) against adding 105 stars for Zabbix (+1.7%). Scanopy is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Scanopy last updated 10 hours ago and Zabbix 16 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Scanopy uses Typescript, Rust, SvelteKit while Zabbix leverages SCSS, Golang, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, Perl.
Zabbix has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Scanopy which began 1 year ago. This 11.8-year head start suggests Zabbix may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Scanopy and Zabbix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.