Learn how Scanopy and Zabbix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.20.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
scanopy/scanopy
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
zabbix/zabbix
Both Scanopy and Zabbix have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Scanopy having 5,963 stars and Zabbix having 6,575 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Zabbix has 1,286 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Scanopy and Zabbix are moving at much the same rate, adding 88 stars and adding 98 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.5% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Scanopy last updated 1 day ago and Zabbix 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Scanopy uses Typescript, Rust, SvelteKit while Zabbix leverages Golang, SCSS, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, Perl.
Zabbix has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Scanopy which began 1 year ago. This 11.8-year head start suggests Zabbix may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Scanopy and Zabbix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.