Learn how NetData and Scanopy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both NetData and Scanopy have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NetData significantly outpaces Scanopy in community adoption with 80,229 stars compared to 5,335 stars on GitHub. This 15.0x difference suggests NetData has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NetData has 6,590 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Scanopy is growing faster, adding 69 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 496 stars for NetData (+0.6%). Scanopy is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with NetData last updated 9 hours ago and Scanopy 3 days ago.
NetData has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Scanopy which began 11 months ago. This 12.5-year head start suggests NetData may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Scanopy uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: NetData also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both NetData and Scanopy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.