Learn how Nagios and Scanopy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Nagios and Scanopy have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Scanopy leads in popularity with 5,703 stars vs 2,041 stars for Nagios. The 179% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Nagios has 481 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Scanopy is growing faster, adding 437 stars in the last 30 days (+8.3%) against adding 2 stars for Nagios (+0.1%). Scanopy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Nagios last updated 1 month ago and Scanopy 6 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Nagios uses C, Objective-C, PHP, Ruby, Perl while Scanopy leverages Typescript, Rust, SvelteKit.
Nagios has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Scanopy which began 11 months ago. This 11.9-year head start suggests Nagios may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Nagios is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Scanopy uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Nagios and Scanopy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.