Learn how Nagios and Scanopy differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Scanopy appears to have several advantages over Nagios, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Scanopy leads in popularity with 5,816 stars vs 2,047 stars for Nagios. The 184% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Nagios has 483 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Scanopy is growing faster, adding 184 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 8 stars for Nagios (+0.4%). Scanopy is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Scanopy shows more recent development activity with its last commit 8 hours ago, while Nagios was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Scanopy is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Nagios uses C, Objective-C, PHP, Ruby, Perl while Scanopy leverages Typescript, Rust, SvelteKit.
Nagios has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Scanopy which began 1 year ago. This 11.9-year head start suggests Nagios may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Nagios is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Scanopy uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Nagios and Scanopy offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.