Learn how Icinga and Nagios differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Icinga and Nagios have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Icinga and Nagios show comparable community engagement with 2,232 and 2,040 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Icinga has 617 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Icinga and Nagios are moving at much the same rate, adding 14 stars and adding 9 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Icinga last updated 19 hours ago and Nagios 12 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Icinga uses Python, C++, C# while Nagios leverages CSS, PHP, Ruby, Perl.
Both projects started around the same time, with Icinga beginning 13 years ago and Nagios 13 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Icinga is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Nagios uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Icinga and Nagios offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.