Learn how Icinga and Nagios differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Icinga and Nagios have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Icinga having 2,199 stars and Nagios having 1,986 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Icinga has 605 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Icinga last updated 1 day ago and Nagios 18 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Icinga uses Python, C++, C# while Nagios leverages CSS, PHP, Ruby, Perl.
Both projects started around the same time, with Icinga beginning 13 years ago and Nagios 12 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Icinga is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Nagios uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.