Learn how Icinga and Nagios differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Both Icinga and Nagios have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Icinga and Nagios show comparable community engagement with 2,208 and 2,014 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Icinga has 608 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Icinga last updated 1 day ago and Nagios 18 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Icinga uses Python, C++, C# while Nagios leverages CSS, PHP, Ruby, Perl.
Both projects started around the same time, with Icinga beginning 13 years ago and Nagios 12 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Icinga is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Nagios uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.