Learn how Nagios and Zabbix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Zabbix appears to have several advantages over Nagios, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zabbix significantly outpaces Nagios in community adoption with 6,377 stars compared to 2,044 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Zabbix has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zabbix has 1,254 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zabbix is growing faster, adding 105 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 6 stars for Nagios (+0.3%). Zabbix is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Zabbix shows more recent development activity with its last commit 16 hours ago, while Nagios was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Zabbix is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, C, Objective-C, PHP, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Nagios uses Ruby while Zabbix leverages SCSS, Golang, Java, C++.
Both projects started around the same time, with Nagios beginning 13 years ago and Zabbix 13 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Nagios is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Zabbix uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Nagios and Zabbix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.