Learn how Nagios and Zabbix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 months agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
4.5.14License
GPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
nagioscore
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
zabbix/zabbix
Zabbix appears to have several advantages over Nagios, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zabbix significantly outpaces Nagios in community adoption with 6,507 stars compared to 2,061 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests Zabbix has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zabbix has 1,269 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zabbix is growing faster, adding 92 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 15 stars for Nagios (+0.7%). Zabbix is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Zabbix shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while Nagios was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Zabbix is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, C, Objective-C, PHP, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Nagios uses Ruby while Zabbix leverages Golang, SCSS, Java, C++.
Both projects started around the same time, with Nagios beginning 13 years ago and Zabbix 13 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Nagios is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Zabbix uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Nagios and Zabbix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.