Learn how NetData and Zabbix differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both NetData and Zabbix have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NetData significantly outpaces Zabbix in community adoption with 80,291 stars compared to 6,306 stars on GitHub. This 12.7x difference suggests NetData has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NetData has 6,601 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zabbix is growing faster, adding 59 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 435 stars for NetData (+0.5%). Zabbix is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with NetData last updated 11 hours ago and Zabbix 13 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with NetData beginning 13 years ago and Zabbix 12 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Zabbix uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring. However, they also have distinct specializations: NetData also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both NetData and Zabbix offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.