Learn how Apache SkyWalking and NetData differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

NetData appears to have several advantages over Apache SkyWalking, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NetData significantly outpaces Apache SkyWalking in community adoption with 80,291 stars compared to 24,929 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests NetData has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Apache SkyWalking has 6,633 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
NetData is growing faster, adding 435 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 12 stars for Apache SkyWalking (0%). NetData is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache SkyWalking last updated 23 hours ago and NetData 10 hours ago.
NetData has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Apache SkyWalking which began 11 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests NetData may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 while NetData uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Apache SkyWalking also focuses on Log Management while NetData extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Apache SkyWalking and NetData offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs