What is the main difference between Apache SkyWalking and Maple?

Apache SkyWalking and Maple are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Apache SkyWalking or Maple?

The choice between Apache SkyWalking and Maple depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Apache SkyWalking to Maple?

Migration between Apache SkyWalking and Maple is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

ScreenshotOne – The screenshot API for developers. Render screenshots in one simple API call

Learn More

Apache SkyWalking vs Maple

Learn how Apache SkyWalking and Maple differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

Apache SkyWalking

Open source observability platform covering distributed tracing, metrics, logs, profiling, and LLM cost tracking across 10+ languages with eBPF support on Kubernetes.

Visit Apache SkyWalking Read more

24,952stars+33(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v11.0.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
apache/skywalking

Maple

Observability platform built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse. Collect, visualize, and query distributed traces, logs, and metrics, with an MCP server for AI agent diagnostics.

Visit Maple Read more

1,782stars+96(+5.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
20 hours ago
Repository age
7 months
Version
v0.0.22
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/maple

Detailed Comparison

Apache SkyWalking appears to have several advantages over Maple, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Apache SkyWalking wins

Community & Popularity

Apache SkyWalking significantly outpaces Maple in community adoption with 24,952 stars compared to 1,782 stars on GitHub. This 14.0x difference suggests Apache SkyWalking has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Apache SkyWalking has 6,634 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Maple wins

Growth Momentum

Maple is growing faster, adding 96 stars in the last 30 days (+5.7%) against adding 33 stars for Apache SkyWalking (+0.1%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Apache SkyWalking last updated 14 hours ago and Maple 20 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Apache SkyWalking uses PHP, Java, Lua while Maple leverages CSS, JSX, Rust, Vue, Swift.

Apache SkyWalking wins

Project Maturity

Apache SkyWalking has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Maple which began 7 months ago. This 10.4-year head start suggests Apache SkyWalking may have more mature features and established processes.

Apache SkyWalking wins