What is the main difference between Apache SkyWalking and HyperDX?

Apache SkyWalking and HyperDX are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Apache SkyWalking or HyperDX?

The choice between Apache SkyWalking and HyperDX depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Apache SkyWalking to HyperDX?

Migration between Apache SkyWalking and HyperDX is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

ScreenshotOne – The screenshot API for developers. Render screenshots in one simple API call

Learn More

Apache SkyWalking vs HyperDX

Learn how Apache SkyWalking and HyperDX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

Apache SkyWalking

Open source observability platform covering distributed tracing, metrics, logs, profiling, and LLM cost tracking across 10+ languages with eBPF support on Kubernetes.

Visit Apache SkyWalking Read more

24,952stars+33(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v11.0.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
apache/skywalking

HyperDX

Open source observability platform unifying session replays, logs, traces, metrics and errors. Fast search, automatic clustering, $0.40/GB pricing.

Visit HyperDX Read more

9,889stars+54(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v0.6.3
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
hyperdxio/hyperdx

Detailed Comparison

Both Apache SkyWalking and HyperDX have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Apache SkyWalking wins

Community & Popularity

Apache SkyWalking leads in popularity with 24,952 stars vs 9,889 stars for HyperDX. The 152% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Apache SkyWalking has 6,634 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

HyperDX wins

Growth Momentum

HyperDX is growing faster, adding 54 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 33 stars for Apache SkyWalking (+0.1%). HyperDX is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Apache SkyWalking last updated 14 hours ago and HyperDX 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Apache SkyWalking uses Python, PHP, Java, Lua while HyperDX leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js, SCSS.

Apache SkyWalking wins

Project Maturity

Apache SkyWalking has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to HyperDX which began 3 years ago. This 8.0-year head start suggests Apache SkyWalking may have more mature features and established processes.

HyperDX wins

Licensing

HyperDX uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Apache SkyWalking's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM), Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: HyperDX extends into Error Tracking.

Comparable