Learn how HyperDX and Sentry differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both HyperDX and Sentry have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Sentry significantly outpaces HyperDX in community adoption with 44,578 stars compared to 9,842 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests Sentry has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Sentry has 4,816 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
HyperDX is growing faster, adding 152 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 231 stars for Sentry (+0.5%). HyperDX is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with HyperDX last updated 10 hours ago and Sentry 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HyperDX uses JSX, Next.js, SCSS, Golang while Sentry leverages Python, Lua.
Sentry has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to HyperDX which began 3 years ago. This 13.2-year head start suggests Sentry may have more mature features and established processes.
HyperDX is licensed under MIT, while Sentry's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM), Error Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: HyperDX also focuses on Log Management.
Both HyperDX and Sentry offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.