Logstash leads in popularity with 14,904 stars vs 9,782 stars for HyperDX. The 52% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Logstash has 3,508 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with HyperDX last updated 4 hours ago and Logstash 5 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HyperDX uses JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, SCSS, Golang while Logstash leverages Python, C, Java, Ruby.

Logstash has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to HyperDX which began 3 years ago. This 13.0-year head start suggests Logstash may have more mature features and established processes.

HyperDX is licensed under MIT, while Logstash's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: HyperDX also focuses on Performance Monitoring (APM), Monitoring & Observability, Error Tracking while Logstash extends into ETL & Data Integration, Stream Processing.

HyperDX provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Logstash may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.