Learn how Logstash and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these log management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

SigNoz appears to have several advantages over Logstash, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SigNoz leads in popularity with 31,881 stars vs 14,926 stars for Logstash. The 114% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Logstash has 3,504 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
SigNoz is growing faster, adding 530 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 19 stars for Logstash (+0.1%). SigNoz is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logstash last updated 7 hours ago and SigNoz 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logstash uses CSS, C, Java, Ruby while SigNoz leverages JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Golang.
Logstash has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to SigNoz which began 6 years ago. This 10.3-year head start suggests Logstash may have more mature features and established processes.
SigNoz is licensed under MIT, while Logstash's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Logstash also focuses on ETL & Data Integration, Stream Processing while SigNoz extends into Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both Logstash and SigNoz offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.