Learn how GreptimeDB and Logstash differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these log management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both GreptimeDB and Logstash have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Logstash leads in popularity with 14,926 stars vs 6,552 stars for GreptimeDB. The 128% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Logstash has 3,504 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
GreptimeDB is growing faster, adding 66 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 19 stars for Logstash (+0.1%). GreptimeDB is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with GreptimeDB last updated 11 hours ago and Logstash 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: GreptimeDB uses JavaScript, Typescript, Rust while Logstash leverages CSS, C, Java, Ruby.
Logstash has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to GreptimeDB which began 4 years ago. This 11.6-year head start suggests Logstash may have more mature features and established processes.
GreptimeDB is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Logstash's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: GreptimeDB also focuses on Time Series Databases while Logstash extends into ETL & Data Integration, Stream Processing.
Both GreptimeDB and Logstash offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.