Learn how GreptimeDB and OpenObserve differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these log management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

OpenObserve appears to have several advantages over GreptimeDB, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenObserve significantly outpaces GreptimeDB in community adoption with 21,603 stars compared to 6,589 stars on GitHub. This 3.3x difference suggests OpenObserve has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenObserve has 1,063 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenObserve is growing faster, adding 1,098 stars in the last 30 days (+5.4%) against adding 76 stars for GreptimeDB (+1.2%). OpenObserve is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with GreptimeDB last updated 14 hours ago and OpenObserve 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: GreptimeDB uses Python while OpenObserve leverages CSS, SCSS, Vue.
Both projects started around the same time, with GreptimeDB beginning 4 years ago and OpenObserve 4 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: GreptimeDB is licensed under Apache-2.0 while OpenObserve uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: GreptimeDB also focuses on Time Series Databases while OpenObserve extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both GreptimeDB and OpenObserve offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs