What is the main difference between HyperDX and OpenObserve?

HyperDX and OpenObserve are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: HyperDX or OpenObserve?

The choice between HyperDX and OpenObserve depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from HyperDX to OpenObserve?

Migration between HyperDX and OpenObserve is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

HyperDX vs OpenObserve

Learn how HyperDX and OpenObserve differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

HyperDX

Open source observability platform unifying session replays, logs, traces, metrics and errors. Fast search, automatic clustering, $0.40/GB pricing.

Visit HyperDX Read more

9,999stars+60(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
2.43.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
hyperdxio/hyperdx

OpenObserve

Monitor logs, metrics, and traces with an open-source observability platform. Achieve petabyte scale with 140x lower storage costs and high performance.

Visit OpenObserve Read more

22,897stars+590(+2.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
v1.2.0-rc1
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
openobserve

Detailed Comparison

Both HyperDX and OpenObserve have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

OpenObserve wins

Community & Popularity

OpenObserve leads in popularity with 22,897 stars vs 9,999 stars for HyperDX. The 129% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenObserve has 1,188 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

OpenObserve wins

Growth Momentum

OpenObserve is growing faster, adding 590 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 60 stars for HyperDX (+0.6%). OpenObserve is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with HyperDX last updated 2 days ago and OpenObserve 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HyperDX uses JSX, Next.js, Golang while OpenObserve leverages Rust, Vue.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with HyperDX beginning 3 years ago and OpenObserve 4 years ago.

HyperDX wins

Licensing

HyperDX uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenObserve's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM), Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: HyperDX also focuses on Error Tracking.

Comparable