Ad
Learn more

OpenObserve vs SigNoz

Learn how OpenObserve and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

vs

OpenObserve

Monitor logs, metrics, and traces with an open-source observability platform. Achieve petabyte scale with 140x lower storage costs and high performance.
22,459stars+377(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of OpenObserve

SigNoz

Comprehensive monitoring and troubleshooting solution for microservices architectures, offering metrics, traces, and logs in a single pane.
32,428stars+258(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    3 hours ago
  • Repository age

    6 years
  • Version

    v0.147.0
  • License

    MIT
  • Self-hosted

    Yes
  • Repository

    signoz/signoz
Screenshot of SigNoz

Detailed Comparison

Both OpenObserve and SigNoz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable
Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with OpenObserve having 22,459 stars and SigNoz having 32,428 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, SigNoz has 2,549 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

OpenObserve wins
Growth Momentum

OpenObserve is growing faster, adding 377 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 258 stars for SigNoz (+0.8%). OpenObserve is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with OpenObserve last updated 2 hours ago and SigNoz 3 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenObserve uses CSS, Rust, Vue while SigNoz leverages JSX, Python, Golang.

SigNoz wins
Project Maturity

SigNoz has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to OpenObserve which began 4 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests SigNoz may have more mature features and established processes.

SigNoz wins
Licensing

SigNoz uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenObserve's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM), Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: SigNoz extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both OpenObserve and SigNoz offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.