Grafana vs SigNoz
Learn how Grafana and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Learn how Grafana and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Grafana
Auto-fetched .
SigNoz
Stars
27,290Forks
2,212Last commit
2 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsSelf-hosted
Yes
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Grafana appears to have several advantages over SigNoz, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grafana appears to have several advantages over SigNoz, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Grafana leads in popularity with 74,340 stars vs 27,290 stars for SigNoz. The 172% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 14,050 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 3 hours ago and SigNoz 2 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses CSS, Ruby while SigNoz leverages SCSS.
Project Maturity
Grafana has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to SigNoz which began 5 years ago. This 7.2-year head start suggests Grafana may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while SigNoz's license terms are not publicly specified.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Data Visualization while SigNoz extends into Log Management, Monitoring & Observability.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Grafana and SigNoz offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Databuddy – AI-Native Web & Product Analytics you can trust, turn manual dashboards into automated insights.