What is the main difference between Grafana and SigNoz?

Grafana and SigNoz are both infrastructure monitoring tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Grafana or SigNoz?

The choice between Grafana and SigNoz depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Grafana to SigNoz?

Migration between Grafana and SigNoz is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Grafana vs SigNoz

Learn how Grafana and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.

Grafana

Grafana unifies metrics, logs, traces, profiles, and business data into one OpenTelemetry-native platform with AI-assisted root cause analysis and adaptive cost controls.

Visit Grafana Read more

77,638stars+587(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
13 years
Version
v13.3.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
grafana/grafana

SigNoz

Comprehensive monitoring and troubleshooting solution for microservices architectures, offering metrics, traces, and logs in a single pane.

Visit SigNoz Read more

32,509stars+241(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v0.148.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
signoz/signoz

Detailed Comparison

Both Grafana and SigNoz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Grafana wins

Community & Popularity

Grafana leads in popularity with 77,638 stars vs 32,509 stars for SigNoz. The 139% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 14,905 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Grafana and SigNoz are moving at much the same rate, adding 587 stars and adding 241 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.8% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 9 hours ago and SigNoz 9 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses CSS, Ruby while SigNoz leverages SCSS.

Grafana wins

Project Maturity

Grafana has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to SigNoz which began 6 years ago. This 7.2-year head start suggests Grafana may have more mature features and established processes.

SigNoz wins

Licensing

SigNoz uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Grafana's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Data Visualization while SigNoz extends into Log Management.

Comparable