Learn how Grafana and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Grafana appears to have several advantages over Uptrace, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grafana significantly outpaces Uptrace in community adoption with 76,546 stars compared to 4,278 stars on GitHub. This 17.9x difference suggests Grafana has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 14,685 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Grafana and Uptrace are moving at much the same rate, adding 631 stars and adding 29 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.8% vs +0.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 13 hours ago and Uptrace 20 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses CSS, JSX while Uptrace leverages SCSS, Vue, Django.
Grafana has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Uptrace which began 5 years ago. This 8.1-year head start suggests Grafana may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Data Visualization.
Both Grafana and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs