Learn how Grafana and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Grafana appears to have several advantages over Uptrace, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Grafana significantly outpaces Uptrace in community adoption with 73,271 stars compared to 4,174 stars on GitHub. This 17.6x difference suggests Grafana has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 13,755 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 8 hours ago and Uptrace 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses CSS, JSX while Uptrace leverages SCSS, Vue, Django.
Grafana has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Uptrace which began 4 years ago. This 8.1-year head start suggests Grafana may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Data Visualization.
Both Grafana and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.