Learn how Grafana and NetData differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Grafana and NetData have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Grafana and NetData show comparable community engagement with 77,279 and 80,901 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Grafana has 14,840 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Grafana and NetData are moving at much the same rate, adding 557 stars and adding 401 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.7% vs +0.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Grafana last updated 7 hours ago and NetData 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Grafana uses Typescript, JSX, Ruby while NetData leverages Rust, C, Objective-C, C++.
Both projects started around the same time, with Grafana beginning 13 years ago and NetData 13 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while NetData uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Grafana also focuses on Data Visualization.
Both Grafana and NetData offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs