Learn how NetData and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both NetData and Uptrace have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
NetData significantly outpaces Uptrace in community adoption with 78,493 stars compared to 4,174 stars on GitHub. This 18.8x difference suggests NetData has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, NetData has 6,415 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with NetData last updated 9 hours ago and Uptrace 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: NetData uses CSS, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++ while Uptrace leverages Typescript, SCSS, Vue, Ruby, Django.
NetData has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Uptrace which began 4 years ago. This 8.6-year head start suggests NetData may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Uptrace uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM).
Uptrace provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while NetData may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.