Learn how Apache SkyWalking and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Apache SkyWalking and Uptrace have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Apache SkyWalking significantly outpaces Uptrace in community adoption with 24,929 stars compared to 4,269 stars on GitHub. This 5.8x difference suggests Apache SkyWalking has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Apache SkyWalking has 6,633 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Uptrace is growing faster, adding 23 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 12 stars for Apache SkyWalking (0%). Uptrace is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache SkyWalking last updated 23 hours ago and Uptrace 12 days ago.
Apache SkyWalking has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Uptrace which began 5 years ago. This 6.2-year head start suggests Apache SkyWalking may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Uptrace uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Apache SkyWalking also focuses on Log Management while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Apache SkyWalking and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs