What is the main difference between Apache SkyWalking and SigNoz?

Apache SkyWalking and SigNoz are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Apache SkyWalking or SigNoz?

The choice between Apache SkyWalking and SigNoz depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Apache SkyWalking to SigNoz?

Migration between Apache SkyWalking and SigNoz is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

ScreenshotOne – The screenshot API for developers. Render screenshots in one simple API call

Learn More

Apache SkyWalking vs SigNoz

Learn how Apache SkyWalking and SigNoz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

Apache SkyWalking

Open source observability platform covering distributed tracing, metrics, logs, profiling, and LLM cost tracking across 10+ languages with eBPF support on Kubernetes.

Visit Apache SkyWalking Read more

24,952stars+33(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v11.0.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
apache/skywalking

SigNoz

Comprehensive monitoring and troubleshooting solution for microservices architectures, offering metrics, traces, and logs in a single pane.

Visit SigNoz Read more

32,106stars+257(+0.8%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
11 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v0.141.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
signoz/signoz

Detailed Comparison

Both Apache SkyWalking and SigNoz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Apache SkyWalking having 24,952 stars and SigNoz having 32,106 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Apache SkyWalking has 6,634 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

SigNoz wins

Growth Momentum

SigNoz is growing faster, adding 257 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 33 stars for Apache SkyWalking (+0.1%). SigNoz is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Apache SkyWalking last updated 14 hours ago and SigNoz 11 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Apache SkyWalking uses PHP, Java, Lua while SigNoz leverages JSX, SCSS.

Apache SkyWalking wins

Project Maturity

Apache SkyWalking has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to SigNoz which began 6 years ago. This 5.2-year head start suggests Apache SkyWalking may have more mature features and established processes.

SigNoz wins

Licensing

SigNoz uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Apache SkyWalking's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM), Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: SigNoz extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.

Comparable