Learn how Apache SkyWalking and Coroot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Apache SkyWalking and Coroot have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Apache SkyWalking significantly outpaces Coroot in community adoption with 24,929 stars compared to 7,888 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests Apache SkyWalking has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Apache SkyWalking has 6,633 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Coroot is growing faster, adding 41 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 12 stars for Apache SkyWalking (0%). Coroot is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache SkyWalking last updated 23 hours ago and Coroot 7 days ago.
Apache SkyWalking has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Coroot which began 4 years ago. This 6.9-year head start suggests Apache SkyWalking may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM), Log Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Coroot extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Apache SkyWalking and Coroot offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs