Learn how SigNoz and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.

Both SigNoz and Uptrace have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SigNoz significantly outpaces Uptrace in community adoption with 31,808 stars compared to 4,256 stars on GitHub. This 7.5x difference suggests SigNoz has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SigNoz has 2,415 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
SigNoz shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while Uptrace was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests SigNoz is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SigNoz uses JSX while Uptrace leverages Vue, Ruby, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with SigNoz beginning 6 years ago and Uptrace 5 years ago.
Uptrace is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while SigNoz's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: SigNoz also focuses on Log Management, Monitoring & Observability.
Both SigNoz and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository