Learn how SigNoz and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure monitoring tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v0.148.1License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
signoz/signoz
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v2.1.0-rc.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
uptrace/uptrace
SigNoz appears to have several advantages over Uptrace, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SigNoz significantly outpaces Uptrace in community adoption with 32,509 stars compared to 4,311 stars on GitHub. This 7.5x difference suggests SigNoz has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SigNoz has 2,573 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
SigNoz is growing faster, adding 241 stars in the last 30 days (+0.7%) against adding 13 stars for Uptrace (+0.3%). SigNoz is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with SigNoz last updated 9 hours ago and Uptrace 12 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SigNoz uses JSX while Uptrace leverages Vue, Ruby, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with SigNoz beginning 6 years ago and Uptrace 5 years ago.
SigNoz uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Uptrace's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure Monitoring, Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: SigNoz also focuses on Log Management.
Both SigNoz and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs