Learn how Highlight and Uptrace differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Highlight and Uptrace have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Highlight leads in popularity with 9,240 stars vs 4,175 stars for Uptrace. The 121% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Highlight has 535 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Highlight last updated 9 days ago and Uptrace 10 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS, Golang, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Highlight uses CSS, JSX, Next.js, Rust, PHP, Java, C#, Perl, Elixir while Uptrace leverages Vue, Django.
Highlight has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Uptrace which began 4 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Highlight may have more mature features and established processes.
Uptrace is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Highlight's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Highlight also focuses on Error Tracking while Uptrace extends into Infrastructure Monitoring.
Both Highlight and Uptrace offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.