Learn how Highlight and Sentry differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Sentry appears to have several advantages over Highlight, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Sentry significantly outpaces Highlight in community adoption with 44,658 stars compared to 9,373 stars on GitHub. This 4.8x difference suggests Sentry has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Sentry has 4,826 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Sentry is growing faster, adding 238 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 22 stars for Highlight (+0.2%). Sentry is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Highlight last updated 10 days ago and Sentry 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Highlight uses JSX, Next.js, SCSS, Golang, Rust, PHP, Java, Ruby, C#, Perl, Elixir while Sentry leverages Lua.
Sentry has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Highlight which began 6 years ago. This 10.1-year head start suggests Sentry may have more mature features and established processes.
Highlight is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Sentry's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM), Error Tracking.
Both Highlight and Sentry offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.