Learn how GlitchTip and Sentry differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these error tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both GlitchTip and Sentry have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Sentry significantly outpaces GlitchTip in community adoption with 44,777 stars compared to 164 stars on GitHub. This 273.0x difference suggests Sentry has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Sentry has 4,851 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
GlitchTip and Sentry are moving at much the same rate, adding 1 stars and adding 220 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.6% vs +0.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with GlitchTip last updated 9 days ago and Sentry 9 hours ago.
Sentry has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to GlitchTip which began 6 years ago. This 10.5-year head start suggests Sentry may have more mature features and established processes.
GlitchTip is licensed under MIT, while Sentry's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Error Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: GlitchTip also focuses on Uptime Monitoring while Sentry extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both GlitchTip and Sentry offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.