What is the main difference between GlitchTip and HyperDX?

GlitchTip and HyperDX are both error tracking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: GlitchTip or HyperDX?

The choice between GlitchTip and HyperDX depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from GlitchTip to HyperDX?

Migration between GlitchTip and HyperDX is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

GlitchTip vs HyperDX

Learn how GlitchTip and HyperDX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these error tracking tools is best for you.

GlitchTip

Self-hostable error tracking platform compatible with Sentry SDKs. Tracks exceptions, monitors performance, checks uptime, and collects logs without the Sentry price tag.

Visit GlitchTip Read more

170stars+5(+3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
6 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
glitchtip/glitchtip

HyperDX

Open source observability platform unifying session replays, logs, traces, metrics and errors. Fast search, automatic clustering, $0.40/GB pricing.

Visit HyperDX Read more

9,971stars+55(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v0.8.0
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
hyperdxio/hyperdx

Detailed Comparison

Both GlitchTip and HyperDX have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

HyperDX wins

Community & Popularity

HyperDX significantly outpaces GlitchTip in community adoption with 9,971 stars compared to 170 stars on GitHub. This 58.7x difference suggests HyperDX has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, HyperDX has 502 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

GlitchTip wins

Growth Momentum

GlitchTip is growing faster, adding 5 stars in the last 30 days (+3%) against adding 55 stars for HyperDX (+0.6%). GlitchTip is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with GlitchTip last updated 2 days ago and HyperDX 2 days ago.

GlitchTip wins

Project Maturity

GlitchTip has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to HyperDX which began 3 years ago. This 2.7-year head start suggests GlitchTip may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Error Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: GlitchTip also focuses on Uptime Monitoring while HyperDX extends into Performance Monitoring (APM), Log Management.

Comparable