Learn how GlitchTip and Highlight differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these error tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both GlitchTip and Highlight have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Highlight significantly outpaces GlitchTip in community adoption with 9,374 stars compared to 164 stars on GitHub. This 57.2x difference suggests Highlight has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Highlight has 675 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
GlitchTip is growing faster, adding 1 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 7 stars for Highlight (+0.1%). GlitchTip is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with GlitchTip last updated 9 days ago and Highlight 26 days ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with GlitchTip beginning 6 years ago and Highlight 6 years ago.
GlitchTip uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Highlight's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Error Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: GlitchTip also focuses on Uptime Monitoring while Highlight extends into Performance Monitoring (APM).
Both GlitchTip and Highlight offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.