Ad
 
Learn More

Highlight vs Maple

Learn how Highlight and Maple differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Highlight

Highlight

Comprehensive monitoring solution offering error tracking, session replay, and performance insights for seamless debugging and optimization.
9,372stars+14(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Highlight
Favicon of Maple

Maple

Observability platform built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse. Collect, visualize, and query distributed traces, logs, and metrics, with an MCP server for AI agent diagnostics.
1,768stars+108(+6.5%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Maple

Detailed Comparison

Highlight appears to have several advantages over Maple, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Highlight wins
Community & Popularity

Highlight significantly outpaces Maple in community adoption with 9,372 stars compared to 1,768 stars on GitHub. This 5.3x difference suggests Highlight has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Highlight has 673 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Maple wins
Growth Momentum

Maple is growing faster, adding 108 stars in the last 30 days (+6.5%) against adding 14 stars for Highlight (+0.1%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Highlight last updated 19 days ago and Maple 15 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Highlight uses Next.js, SCSS, PHP, Java, Ruby, C#, Perl, Elixir while Maple leverages Vue, Swift.

Highlight wins
Project Maturity

Highlight has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Maple which began 7 months ago. This 5.6-year head start suggests Highlight may have more mature features and established processes.

Highlight wins
Licensing

Highlight is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Maple's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Highlight also focuses on Error Tracking while Maple extends into Log Management.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Highlight and Maple offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.