What is the main difference between Highlight and Maple?

Highlight and Maple are both performance monitoring (apm) tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Highlight or Maple?

The choice between Highlight and Maple depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Highlight to Maple?

Migration between Highlight and Maple is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn More

Highlight vs Maple

Learn how Highlight and Maple differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these performance monitoring (apm) tools is best for you.

Highlight

Comprehensive monitoring solution offering error tracking, session replay, and performance insights for seamless debugging and optimization.

Visit Highlight Read more

9,368stars+35(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
22 days ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v0.5.6
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
highlight/highlight

Maple

Observability platform built on OpenTelemetry and ClickHouse. Collect, visualize, and query distributed traces, logs, and metrics, with an MCP server for AI agent diagnostics.

Visit Maple Read more

1,692stars+32(+1.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
6 months
Version
v0.0.18
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
mapletechlabs/maple

Detailed Comparison

Highlight appears to have several advantages over Maple, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Highlight wins

Community & Popularity

Highlight significantly outpaces Maple in community adoption with 9,368 stars compared to 1,692 stars on GitHub. This 5.5x difference suggests Highlight has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Highlight has 670 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Maple wins

Growth Momentum

Maple is growing faster, adding 32 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 35 stars for Highlight (+0.4%). Maple is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Highlight last updated 22 days ago and Maple 1 day ago.

Highlight wins

Project Maturity

Highlight has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Maple which began 6 months ago. This 5.6-year head start suggests Highlight may have more mature features and established processes.

Highlight wins

Licensing

Highlight is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Maple's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Performance Monitoring (APM). However, they also have distinct specializations: Highlight also focuses on Error Tracking while Maple extends into Log Management.

Comparable